Law & Order SVU Season 27 Episode 8 Offered a Strange Case That Led to An Epic Cliffhanger For The Midseason Hiatus
So… did Nikki orchestrate her own kidnapping or not?
Law & Order: SVU Season 27 Episode 8 didn’t answer that question, but it did offer one of the season’s stranger cases.
The fallout from this case was mostly political, and the last five minutes made it frustrating to have to wait until January to find out what happens next.

It Looked Like We Were Headed For A Second Phony Case
Law & Order: SVU Season 27 Episode 5 already featured a woman who made up stories about being raped while actually being the aggressor, so I was hoping that Nikki’s story was true.
Fortunately, we haven’t gone there… at least not yet.
Instead, the episode switched halfway through to the tension between Benson and Chief Tynan, while Carisi also struggled to make his case.

The Problems at Trial Demonstrated the Dangers of Jumping to Conclusions
I didn’t like how the case was initially handled, especially by Bruno.
The cops went into it assuming Greg was lying about everything, simply because his story was strange, and Benson had to intervene when Bruno kept yelling at the guy despite Greg’s demand for a lawyer.
I don’t agree with Chief Tynan that Benson didn’t have enough control over her detectives, but Bruno should have suffered more consequences than he did.
Carisi yelled at Griffin, and Tynan complained that Griffin looked incompetent on the stand.

I’m not Griffin’s biggest fan, but come on!
Bruno admitted that he let his opinion get in the way, but that wasn’t enough. He’s a far more senior detective than Griffin, so why did everyone virtually ignore his role in this?
The detectives should have investigated more thoroughly before jumping to conclusions, but Carisi could also have better prepared Griffin.
It didn’t make sense to me that Carisi warned Griffin to brush up on his cross-examination — isn’t it Carisi’s job as the DA to prep his witnesses for trial, especially given that he was worried about the information in the report?

Griffin’s biggest blunder on the stand was that he kept saying he “determined guilt” rather than “obtained probable cause for arrest.”
That was a rookie mistake — cops should know the difference between their jobs and Carisi’s before they agree to testify — but it was also partially on Carisi.
Carisi clearly didn’t practice any testimony with Griffin, or he would have excised that problematic phrase long before Griffith took the stand.
This whole mess — along with Benson’s testimony — illustrated a core conflict between the SVU team and the rest of the world.
Benson believes survivors, as she should, so she and her team take it for granted that the claims survivors make are FACTS (unless proven otherwise).

Why Did We Need This Eccentric Detective?
I felt like SVU was trying to introduce a character with a similar personality to the late, great Detective Munch, but it didn’t work.
He came off as strange, period, and his personality was distracting.
Plus, it irritated me that his name was Whelan. I’m not over Jamie Whelan’s death at the end of Law & Order: Organized Crime Season 3, and I didn’t need to be reminded of him every time this weirdo was on-screen.


