Meloni, not one to mince words, responded sharply. According to The Mirror, he posted, “POTUS is a clear and present danger to America.” But he didn’t stop there. Meloni also weighed in on the nationwide “No Kings” protests that took place on October 18, 2025, across the United States. These demonstrations, which called for the preservation of democratic norms and protested what many see as the overreach of executive authority, saw a diverse turnout—including celebrities, activists, and ordinary citizens.
With his trademark sarcasm, Meloni shared a screenshot of a post about the protests and warned his fans to “be careful.” He wrote, “These ‘anti-American, anti-capitalism Antifa’ types seem to be masquerading as law abiding, concerned, patriotic Americans using their voice to protest the grift, ineptitude, cruelty, and lawlessness of this admin. #stayalert.” His words, dripping with irony, highlighted the contentious debate over the true nature of the protests and the motivations of those involved.
The protests themselves, as reported by Breitbart News, were reportedly sparsely attended in some locations and ended after just a few hours in others. Still, the spirit of the events was palpable online, with participants sharing images of their protest signs—messages like “Voices NOT Silence” and “NO ‘Faux-King’ WAY”—and expressing solidarity with the movement. One supporter enthused, “It was a great day!” while another lamented not being able to attend but cheered from afar, “I was cheering all day for them!”
President Trump, for his part, responded to the protests in his signature style: with a blend of mockery and bravado. Throughout the day on October 18, he shared a series of “King Trump” memes and even posted a Top Gun-style video showing himself dumping mud on protesters, all set to the tune of Kenny Loggins’ “Danger Zone.” The memes and video quickly made the rounds on social media, drawing both laughter and outrage, depending on one’s political leanings.
Meloni’s criticism of Trump did not go unchallenged. One social media user asked pointedly, “Why is he a danger? Is it because he stopped the invasion over our southern border? Is it that he is bringing manufacturing investment to the US? Is it the peace deals or getting hostages released? Is it helping hourly employees by eliminating taxes on tips and OT?” Meloni, undeterred, fired back: “No it’s the enjoyment of cruelty, breaking of norms, the normalizing of open grifting, the lies, incompetence, malignant narcissism, the attempted insurrection, authoritarianism, the sucking up to Putin. So even tho a point or two of urs is kinda valid, the stuff I see outweighs it.”
Meloni’s willingness to engage directly with critics and supporters alike only fueled the conversation. Fans rushed to his defense, with one writing, “A-men Sir!!! Darn I wish I could have been at one! Irish so…No unfortunately…buuutt….I was cheering all day for them!” Another added, “Love you Stabler & Fin @FINALLEVEL… BOTH respectable Americans above anything else. Thank you for using your platforms for GOOD.”
Notably, Meloni was far from the only high-profile figure to back the No Kings protests. Acclaimed horror author Stephen King lent his voice to the movement, responding to a post from Mike Johnson that accused the rallies of being funded by “the billionaire who hates America the MOST.” King replied, “They are actually Love America rallies, Mike. Ordinary people, man, trying to save the country from a despot.” Other celebrities, including Pedro Pascal, Jamie Lee Curtis, and Glenn Close, showed up in person to support the demonstrations, adding star power and drawing further media attention.
The protests, though not massive in scale, became a lightning rod for debates about American democracy, freedom of speech, and the limits of presidential authority. Critics of the protests, many of them Trump supporters, dismissed the events as the work of “anti-American” agitators. Supporters, meanwhile, insisted that the rallies were about defending the Constitution and resisting what they see as authoritarian impulses from the current administration.
The controversy over George Santos’ commutation added fuel to the fire. Santos, whose conviction on 23 counts of identity theft and wire fraud had made headlines, became a symbol for both sides. For Trump’s critics, his release was yet another example of the president flouting norms and using his power to reward loyalists or embattled political allies. For Trump’s supporters, the commutation was framed as a corrective to what they saw as an overly harsh sentence and a politically motivated prosecution.
Throughout the weekend, social media platforms buzzed with debate, memes, and pointed commentary. The No Kings protests may have been modest in size, but their impact was magnified by the involvement of celebrities and the heated reactions they provoked. As Meloni’s words continued to echo—“POTUS is a clear and present danger to America”—both sides dug in, convinced of the righteousness of their cause.
As the dust settles on a weekend of protests, presidential trolling, and celebrity activism, the country finds itself once again grappling with the fundamental question: What kind of leadership—and what kind of dissent—defines American democracy in 2025?
